On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <[email protected]> wrote: > Because Parsec-3 apparently still has some speed regressions compared > to Parsec-2 (I'm not qualified to note whether its design is slow or > if you have to use it differently to get good performance out of it), > so many developers prefer to stick to Parsec-2 for this reason.
I thought Parsec 3.1 had pretty much caught up with the performance of parsec 2? _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
