Vo Minh Thu wrote:
Is it right that by using flattr, you end up donating the same amount
of money to every flattred person in a month?
Yes.
So you can donate more
the previous month to some project you value less than another project
the next month. This seems weird to me.
That's the price of the vanishing marginal cost of flattr donations. :)
But how about putting it this way: isn't it great that you no longer
have to worry about attributing fair values to each project, since this
cognitive burden would make you less likely of donating in the first
place? ;)
Personally, I revisit projects I value a lot every month anyway, which
boils down to a larger share in the end.
Regards,
Heinrich Apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
