On 10/2/10 3:13 PM, Christopher Done wrote:
There's nothing more annoying than having to introduce intermediate
bindings when you're going to immediate pattern match against it
immediately and never use it again. It's both annoying to have to
think of a variable name that makes sense and is not in scope or will
be in scope, and annoying to type it out, and it's just ugly. This is
*not* a special-case, it happens all the time and it's one of the few
things in the syntax I wish could be updated.
+1.
In Mark Jones' new language, Habit, they have monadic versions of case
and if-then-else for precisely this reason.
I'm not sure if the (case of {...}) syntax is the best one to use for
this feature, but I'd love to get rid of those intermediate names for
monadic case expressions.
--
Live well,
~wren
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
