> > I see ... I think I understand now. > hmmm ... I am little disappointed though - does that mean that "all > the laziness" cool stuffs can actually be done using > iterators(generators)? > As in, but for the inconvenient syntax, you can do it all in - say java?
Yes. It would slightly easier in, say, C# or C++. I think 'D' achieves its implementation of the 'lazy' keyword using a similar approach. But I did not understand why you are disappointed ?
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
