> > A slightly different suggestion from Simon PJ and myself (we agreed on > > something syntax-related :-) is the following: > > > \case 1 -> f > > 2 -> g > > ... > > \case { 1 -> f; 2 -> g } > > +1 > > I like this because it has exactly the same properties of Max's > case-of, but is shorter and still reads with sense. +1 _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
- Re: [Haskell-cafe] Lambda-case / ... Nicolas Wu
- Re: [Haskell-cafe] Lambda-ca... Neil Brown
- Re: [Haskell-cafe] Lambda-ca... Gábor Lehel
- Re: [Haskell-cafe] Lambda-case / ... Henning Thielemann
- Re: [Haskell-cafe] Lambda-ca... Brandon S Allbery KF8NH
- Re: [Haskell-cafe] Lambd... Richard O'Keefe
- Re: [Haskell-cafe] Lambda-ca... Max Bolingbroke
- Re: [Haskell-cafe] Lambd... Evan Laforge
- [Haskell-cafe] Re: Lambd... Simon Marlow
- Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: L... Christopher Done
- [Haskell-cafe] Re: Lambd... steffen
- Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: L... Gregory Crosswhite
- Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: L... Sterling Clover
- Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: L... Dean Herington
- Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: L... Evan Laforge
- Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: L... Jean-Marie Gaillourdet
- Re: [Haskell-cafe] Lambda-case / lambda-if Roel van Dijk
- Re: [Haskell-cafe] Lambda-case / lambda-if Ozgur Akgun