-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/11/10 04:06 , Sittampalam, Ganesh wrote: > While I agree with the potential benefits, I also worry that you will > end up making something that is far less well tested in practice. For > widely used and fairly low-level libraries like gnutls, openssl and > zlib, I'm just skeptical that the benefits outweigh the risks and costs.
I see your point, but I would be prepared to trust a clean, typesafe (and especially if it's pure) Haskell implementation over the Cthulhu's-tentacles that is openssl. :) - -- brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allb...@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allb...@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAky0VikACgkQIn7hlCsL25Wt/QCgneAyuCttwnyrHG4vuC22sNBp Y7gAnAtKUoNekXUb61ISYwnmSkZWJejM =3+oI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe