Ben Franksen wrote: >> > That cutting edge research is done for Haskell as well as for its >> > implementations is of course good to know, but just stating it is >> > not nearly enough: such a statement must be corroberated with >> > evidence, otherwise it is just idle marketing. (Not that there >> > wouldn't be evidence amass, it's just that none is given.) >> >> You literally want evidence that research played a part in Haskell, in >> its opening statement? Why?? > > I reject this objection.
Oops, translation error. I wanted to say: I withdraw this objection. Cheers Ben _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
