> try to compute their length Yes ^^, that's silly.
> I don't see any reason why using multiple infinite lists would have anything to do with the performance That's comforting. Well, it seems to be a very simple, haskellish and elegant solution, so basic pragmatism -- with an slice of pessimism -- tells it was too good too be true ^^. 2010/12/15 Brent Yorgey <[email protected]> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 02:52:11PM +0100, Yves Parès wrote: > > Hello Café, > > > > So is it viable or would the use of multiple infinite lists kill the > > performances? > > Sounds perfectly reasonable to me. I don't see any reason why using > multiple infinite lists would have anything to do with the performance > of your program -- unless you do something silly like try to compute > their length. =) > > -Brent > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
