On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Leon Smith <leon.p.sm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Michael Snoyman <mich...@snoyman.com> wrote: > >> In general I think it would be a good thing to have solid, low-level >> bindings to PostgreSQL. > > Well, there is PostgreSQL and libpq on hackage: > > http://hackage.haskell.org/package/libpq > http://hackage.haskell.org/package/PostgreSQL > > The PostgreSQL looks like it's in need of maintenance, and hasn't > been updated in a few years. libpq is new, and looks promising. I > haven't really used either one, so I can't really say too much about > either. > > Best, > Leon >
I've tried PostgreSQL before, and if I remember correctly I couldn't even build it. libpq looks interesting, I'd like to try it out. Unfortunately it depends on unix, which would be a problem for Windows users. If it looks like a good fit for persistent-postgresql, maybe I can convince the author to replace the unix dep with something else (unix-compat might be sufficient). Thanks for the pointer, Michael _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
