On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 13:13 -0200, Felipe Almeida Lessa wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Maciej Piechotka <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> > It allows to achive in parsing a near-attoparsec levels of speed
> > (benchmarks from attoparsec library shown a 0.450 ± 0.028 for
> > attoparsec, 0.479 ± 0.043 for nanoparsec and 1.532 ± 0.084 for parsec 3)
> > combining the flexibility of stream of parsec 3 with the iterative
> > approach and speed of attoparsec.
> 
> Nice!  How does it compare to attoparsec-text performance-wise?


I haven't checked. So far there are specializations for ByteString but
not Text. I would expect similar penalty for it anyway (I'll try to port
tests and report values).

> Although I'm its maintainer, duplicating libraries isn't funny =).
> 

"Deduplication" was a goal of the nanoparsec. Most of the code and
documentation is from attoparsec anyway.

> Cheers,
> 

Regards

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to