On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5 February 2011 10:14, Luke Palmer <[email protected]> wrote: >> I host all my modules on github. It is a very supportive environment >> for spontaneous collaborative development. c.h.o is a nice place, but >> lacks in maturity in comparison. As long as there is a complete, free >> place like github around, why not use it? > > 1) Github uses git, not darcs.
Git is good enough for serious use. > 2) I know who runs/controls c.h.o, but not github (so if something > goes wrong...) If something goes wrong, the maintainer of c.h.o can commiserate with you about it being down. I suspect he/she doesn't have a large team of dedicated sysadmins to put it right, or a set of redundant servers. > 3) Maturity? I can put darcs repos there, how mature does it need to be? integrated pull requests, commenting systems, notifications of updates, issue trackers... if you particularly want to use something else for each of these, that's fine, but it's nice to have a reasonable default. mark -- A UNIX signature isn't a return address, it's the ASCII equivalent of a black velvet clown painting. It's a rectangle of carets surrounding a quote from a literary giant of weeniedom like Heinlein or Dr. Who. -- Chris Maeda _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
