> > From: Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <[email protected]> > > On 7 February 2011 12:30, wren ng thornton <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2/6/11 4:53 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote: > >> > >> On 7 February 2011 08:12, Alexey Khudyakov<[email protected]> > >> ?wrote: > >>> > >>> Also there is a container-classes package which provide set of type > class > >>> for containers. > >>> > >>> [1] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/container-classes > >> > >> Don't use that package: it's broken. ?I did start on a re-write that > >> works (and there are similar libraries around that I believe do work), > >> but gave up because it was a) too fiddly, and b) I decided that the > >> use case I had for them wasn't worth it (as it would just make that > >> library more complicated and difficult to use, possibly also less > >> efficient). ?If anyone wants it I can certainly send them what I've > >> got though. > > > > Any chance you could push a 0.0.0.1 version which tells people this, so > that > > they know to avoid it? > > Didn't think about that; I'll try to do so tonight. >
Perhaps a better approach would be to ask the hackage maintainer (Ross Patterson, if I'm not mistaken) to deprecate container-classes. John
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
