On Wednesday 09 March 2011 00:34:39, qiqi wrote: > The problem is solved! I found out that both global and local package db > get directory-1.1.0.0 and process-1.0.1.5. I unregistered them and > other caused broken packages in the local package db.
D'oh, I should've seen that. > Then I > successfully installed back hmatrix, ghc-mod, happy and etc. It seems > that xmobar will install directory-1.1.0.0 again in the local package > db. That's not good. And it doesn't seem to do that here: $ cabal install xmobar --dry-run Resolving dependencies... In order, the following would be installed (use -v for more details): stm-2.2.0.1 syb-0.3 X11-1.5.0.0 utf8-string-0.3.6 xmobar-0.12 What does $ cabal install xmobar --dry-run -v3 say for you about directory? > > Did you succeed in installing haddock 2.9? That was built with the compiler (I built from source), no problems. $ haddock --version Haddock version 2.9.2, (c) Simon Marlow 2006 Ported to use the GHC API by David Waern 2006-2008 > Mine got some syntax oriented > error duing cabal install haddock. But it's fine. The same as http://haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2011-March/089902.html ? I don't know if that's been solved. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe