On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 05:51 +0400, Richard Cobbe wrote: > I did some googling and came across a blog post > (http://neilmitchell.blogspot.com/2008/02/adding-data-files-using-cabal.html) > which suggested that I provide my own Paths_pkg.hs file that points to the > files' location in the development copy. When I build with Cabal, the > generated form of this module would override my hand-written one, and it > should therefore work in the installed case as well. > > Unfortunately, that's not happening. Cabal is clearly generating the > module; I can see it in dist/build/autogen. But my copy is overriding the > autogenerated one, even for cabal builds -- at least, that's what I'm > seeing when I run the binary out of dist/build/<package>/<executable>. > > Is there a way to be able to use data files in both contexts?
For such purposes I use separate directory for Paths_pkg.hs and don't notice it in pkg.cabal. For example, imagine "src" directory with source files (appropriately mentioned in pkg.cabal with "hs-source-dirs: src") and additional "plugs" directory with "Paths_pkg.hs" (that is not mentioned in pkg.cabal). In such case cabal builds project with autogenerated Paths_pkg.hs and ghci also can be launched in "src" directory with "ghci Main.hs -i../plugs". Vladimir _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe