On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic < ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 26 April 2011 13:16, Andrew Coppin <andrewcop...@btinternet.com> wrote: > > > > 2. I have no idea how to make Darcs do the thing with "hard links" (is > that > > even supported under Windows?) I just copy the whole folder using the > normal > > OS file tools. > > darcs get path/to/other/local/repo > More specifically than that. This is the workflow I follow with darcs repos. Say, that I want to get the Foo repo: mkdir ~/repos/Foo cd ~/repos/Foo darcs get http://example.com/Foo HEAD darcs get HEAD feature-branch Then I can send the patches from feature-branch to the official Foo repo at any time. I can also merge them back into HEAD doing a darcs pull from feature-branch to HEAD. I think this is quite comparable to the git workflow. > > Either way, you lose the ability to see how branches are related to each > > other, which might be useful in some cases. > > How do you "see" how git branches are related to each other? > You can use gitk to see how the histories have interacted. Jason
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
