On 5/18/11, Jurriën Stutterheim <j.stutterh...@me.com> wrote:
> Regarding 3:
> I was not implying that Haskell should be used only for replacing JS. Far
> from it. I was just saying that we need a solid way to generate JS from
> Haskell so that we can profit even more from Haskell's type safety and not
> have to suffer from the mess that is JS. My Snap-based application is also
> perfectly type-safe, on the server. It's fast too. :)
Jurriën,
I completely agree that we need a good JS generator.
My response was just to the idea that web apps (with JS) could be
a replacement for other GUI solutions. I wasn't implying you were
saying we should only use Haskell for JS. Most useful Haskell apps
right now are pretty GUI-free!
Tom
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
