I think what Andrew meant is that it's not a good idea to have big pile of different implementations of the same library, and all trying to solve the very same problem.
I see this kind of problem in the java community. It seems that developers have a need to create everything from scratch more than making existing ones better. Short history, for example, why do we have to have N libraries to read a file? can't we have just one damn good one? Cheers _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
