On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo <[email protected]>wrote:
> Can't this be mostly solved by putting all these configuration parameters > in a struct and then using implicit parameters: > Implicit parameters seem like a fair option. And propagating: (?fooConf :: FooConf) => ... isn't any more difficult than explicit parameters in the type. I guess the question is whether it is the parameterization or the *staging *that seems more relevant.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
