On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Ryan Ingram <[email protected]> wrote: > The arrow syntax translation uses arr to do plumbing of variables. I think > a promising project would be to figure out exactly what plumbing is needed, > and add those functions to a sort of 'PrimitiveArrow' class. All of these > plumbing functions are trivially implemented in terms of 'arr', when it > exists, but if it doesn't, it should be possible to use the arrow syntax > regardless.
There are already generalized arrows [1]. Is that what you are looking for? Cheers, [1] http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~megacz/garrows/ -- Felipe. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
