> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Roman Cheplyaka <roma <at> ro-che.info> > wrote:
> > Does anyone currently work on Test.SmallCheck? not "working on", but I'm using it in teaching. The one change that I would want in SmallCheck is that Serial should use size, not depth (that is, not take the max over the subtrees, but the sum). I think this would help somewhat against the explosion of test sets. Yes, I can write Serial instances as I fancy but it's the default instances (for tuples, lists) that I think should be changed. At least, an alternative should be provided. On the other hand, that could easily be forked off as a student project, so there is no hurry. Best, Johannes. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
