Well that was a quick response. I think it's silly the idea that someone would cast more votes than one on an election for this, but I can't trust a poll where someone can continually click yes or no over and over. I like your idea.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Michael Snoyman <mich...@snoyman.com>wrote: > I noticed the recent thread about mascots, and trying to get accurate > polling information. Don't consider this email to say I think we need > safeguards against a poll on mascots (are people *really* trying to > rig the election on this???), but I thought this might be a good > features for Haskellers.com. Since we already have the "verified > account" issue, we could use that to break down polls. More > specifically, anyone would be allowed to vote, and then you could > review results for verified users only, all logged in users, or > theoretically even not-logged-in users (not sure how I feel about this > one). > > If people would use this feature, I think I can add it next week. > > Michael > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > -- Heath Matlock +1 256 274 4225
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe