On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Carl Howells <chowell...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Well, as I read it, the whole point of this thread was "They don't > make sense for many instances of Alternative. They should be moved to > a different class." It sounded like you were arguing that any > instance of Alternative where they don't make sense shouldn't be an > instance of Alternative, instead. Correct. And your example of "some (Just 1)" inflooping was not a counterargument, but rather an illustration that perhaps some people (and I'm not trying to imply you here, don't worry) don't understand what some and many are supposed to do.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
