2011/12/22 Gábor Lehel <illiss...@gmail.com> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Robert Clausecker <fuz...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Image you would create your own language with a paradigm similar to > > Haskell or have to chance to change Haskell without the need to keep any > > compatibility. What stuff would you add to your language, what stuff > > would you remove and what problems would you solve completely different? > > > > Thanks in advance for all answers, yours > > > > Robert Clausecker >
I would have compose (probably not called '.') read the same way we read this sentence (and unix pipes) ie left to right. I would not overload . to mean compose and module-access. Probably gadt could be the norm and classic 'data' could be removed.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
