Tom, thank you very much for the ThreadScope feedback. Anything new? Anybody? We are close to a new release, so that's the last call for bug reports before the release. Stay tuned. :)
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:34, Tom Thorne <thomas.thorn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I can't remember if it was threadscope that crashed or the RTS, since I was > also having segfaults in the RTS because of this bug, that is fixed in > 7.2.2: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5552 > > I successfully used threadscope by running my code for fewer iterations to > produce a smaller log, and it was helpful to make sure I was dividing work > equally between the threads. > > I think I still have the log file that was about 1.8GB so I will try running > threadscope on it and see what happens. > > The performance problems I was having turned out to be fixed completely by > changing the GC options passed to the RTS. > > thanks! > > Tom > > On Friday, 16 December 2011 at 09:20, Mikolaj Konarski wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 15:55, Tom Thorne <thomas.thorn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes I will try to run threadscope on it, I tried it before and the event log > output produced about 1.8GB, and then crashed. > > > Hi Tom, > > I'm one of the TS/ghc-events hackers and I'd like to learn more, > fix it or at least put it on the TS/ghc-events issue tracker > (http://trac.haskell.org/ThreadScope). Could you help me reproduce > the problem? Did ThreadScope crash or RTS? Which versions? > Was it 1.8GB of the log file or RAM? Did you succeed eventually? > Any other TS feedback? > > Thank you, > Mikolaj > > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
