I (Sergei) am invesigating (so far) only Unix named pipes. > > I hope you are aware of the many "gotchas" involved with FIFOs. > > There are very good reasons why they are not widely used.
At least in C <-> C, the Unix named pipes do work. And I am trying to replace the first end with Haskell. On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 01:23:24PM -0500, Michael Craig wrote: > Brandon, can you elaborate? Are you talking about UNIX named pipes or > FIFO/queue data structures in general? > > Mike Craig > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Brandon Allbery <allber...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:25, Serge D. Mechveliani <mech...@botik.ru>wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 04:34:37PM +0100, Chadda?? Fouch?? wrote: > >> > Now that seems interesting, but just to be clear : did you choose > >> > this solution (and why won't you use the FFI instead) or is this just > >> > to see how to work it out ? > >> > >> Because it is a direct and the simplest approach. Why does one need a > >> foreign language, if all the needed functions are in the standard > >> Haskell library? > >> > > > > I hope you are aware of the many "gotchas" involved with FIFOs. There are > > very good reasons why they are not widely used. > > > > -- > > brandon s allbery allber...@gmail.com > > wandering unix systems administrator (available) (412) 475-9364 vm/sms > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > > > > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
