I got even more encouraging results on another input - 5 vs 7 seconds:
=========== GHC 7.4.0 ==============
jkff@jkff-laptop ~/projects/logs/... $ tplot -if lat.trace -dk 'within[.]
duration quantile 10 0.25,0.5,0.75,0.9,0.95' -o lat3.png +RTS -s
2,809,230,872 bytes allocated in the heap
358,393,440 bytes copied during GC
42,478,364 bytes maximum residency (68 sample(s))
1,833,848 bytes maximum slop
113 MB total memory in use (0 MB lost due to fragmentation)
Tot time (elapsed) Avg pause Max pause
Gen 0 4740 colls, 0 par 0.39s 0.40s 0.0001s 0.0005s
Gen 1 68 colls, 0 par 0.42s 0.48s 0.0071s 0.1157s
INIT time 0.00s ( 0.00s elapsed)
MUT time 3.76s ( 4.01s elapsed)
GC time 0.82s ( 0.88s elapsed)
EXIT time 0.00s ( 0.00s elapsed)
Total time 4.59s ( 4.89s elapsed)
%GC time 17.8% (18.0% elapsed)
Alloc rate 744,774,183 bytes per MUT second
Productivity 82.2% of total user, 77.2% of total elapsed
============ GHC 7.0.4 ===============
jkff@jkff-laptop ~/projects/logs/... $ tplot -if lat.trace -dk 'within[.]
duration quantile 10 0.25,0.5,0.75,0.9,0.95' -o lat3.png +RTS -s
tplot -if lat.trace -dk within[.] duration quantile 10
0.25,0.5,0.75,0.9,0.95 -o lat3.png +RTS -s
4,024,048,244 bytes allocated in the heap
419,997,300 bytes copied during GC
44,546,920 bytes maximum residency (70 sample(s))
1,840,208 bytes maximum slop
113 MB total memory in use (0 MB lost due to fragmentation)
Generation 0: 6995 collections, 0 parallel, 0.63s, 0.64s elapsed
Generation 1: 70 collections, 0 parallel, 0.39s, 0.43s elapsed
INIT time 0.01s ( 0.00s elapsed)
MUT time 5.96s ( 6.17s elapsed)
GC time 1.02s ( 1.08s elapsed)
EXIT time 0.00s ( 0.00s elapsed)
Total time 6.99s ( 7.24s elapsed)
%GC time 14.6% (14.9% elapsed)
Alloc rate 674,478,767 bytes per MUT second
Productivity 85.3% of total user, 82.3% of total elapsed
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Eugene Kirpichov <ekirpic...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi cafe,
>
> Just wanted to inform you that I've been benchmarking my compute-intensive
> stuff on ghc 7.0.4 vs 7.4.0, and 7.4.0 gave a large speedup - one program
> that took 2.9s on a particular input is now taking 2.2s. This result is
> repeatable.
>
> So I encourage people to try out GHC 7.4.0. Some stuff may stop compiling
> (I had to do 3 basically one-line fixes in 3 packages before I got mine to
> compile), but I didn't encounter other problems.
>
> Below is +RTS -s of two runs: one compiled with ghc 7.4.0 and another with
> 7.0.4.
>
> I can make a more detailed comparison if it's useful and if someone tells
> me how - I thought about including +RTS -p, but Simon Marlow wrote recently
> that it has started giving meaningful results only in 7.4, so comparison
> with 7.0.4 would be unfair.
>
> However in this case I'm sure that the program is heavily compute-bound by
> the following two functions (because it's always compute-bound by them):
> 1)
> https://github.com/jkff/timeplot/blob/master/Tools/TimePlot/Plots.hs#L226
> 2) https://github.com/jkff/timeplot/blob/master/Tools/TimePlot/Conf.hs -
> localToUTC and strptime.
>
> jkff@jkff-laptop ~/projects/logs/... $ tplot -if e.trace -dk 'within[.]
> cumsum 10' -o e.png +RTS -s
> tplot -if e.trace -dk within[.] cumsum 10 -o e.png +RTS -s
> 2,751,756,296 bytes allocated in the heap
> 135,129,112 bytes copied during GC
> 33,149,720 bytes maximum residency (22 sample(s))
> 1,755,868 bytes maximum slop
> 56 MB total memory in use (0 MB lost due to fragmentation)
>
> Generation 0: 4994 collections, 0 parallel, 0.22s, 0.23s elapsed
> Generation 1: 22 collections, 0 parallel, 0.08s, 0.09s elapsed
>
> INIT time 0.01s ( 0.00s elapsed)
> MUT time 2.61s ( 2.91s elapsed)
> GC time 0.30s ( 0.32s elapsed)
> EXIT time 0.00s ( 0.00s elapsed)
> Total time 2.91s ( 3.22s elapsed)
>
> %GC time 10.1% (9.8% elapsed)
>
> Alloc rate 1,051,262,083 bytes per MUT second
>
> Productivity 89.6% of total user, 80.9% of total elapsed
>
> jkff@jkff-laptop ~/projects/logs/... $ tplot -if e.trace -dk 'within[.]
> cumsum 10' -o e.png +RTS -s
> 2,161,811,620 bytes allocated in the heap
> 107,589,660 bytes copied during GC
> 34,799,400 bytes maximum residency (22 sample(s))
> 1,721,152 bytes maximum slop
> 58 MB total memory in use (0 MB lost due to fragmentation)
>
> Tot time (elapsed) Avg pause Max
> pause
> Gen 0 3899 colls, 0 par 0.13s 0.14s 0.0000s
> 0.0003s
> Gen 1 22 colls, 0 par 0.08s 0.09s 0.0043s
> 0.0482s
>
> INIT time 0.00s ( 0.00s elapsed)
> MUT time 2.03s ( 2.28s elapsed)
> GC time 0.21s ( 0.23s elapsed)
> EXIT time 0.00s ( 0.00s elapsed)
> Total time 2.26s ( 2.51s elapsed)
>
> %GC time 9.3% (9.1% elapsed)
>
> Alloc rate 1,056,397,390 bytes per MUT second
>
> Productivity 90.7% of total user, 81.5% of total elapsed
>
>
> --
> Eugene Kirpichov
> Principal Engineer, Mirantis Inc. http://www.mirantis.com/
> Editor, http://fprog.ru/
>
--
Eugene Kirpichov
Principal Engineer, Mirantis Inc. http://www.mirantis.com/
Editor, http://fprog.ru/
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
