Aside from being a horrible oversimplification of the matter (because it's *never* that simple - Wikipedia is not in this movement for commercial interest or the side of SV/HW, but because it opposes the censoring of the internet; neither are people like Dan Kaminsky, who are also opposing from the point of the large-scale security ramifications due to the subversion of DNS' universal nature,) and the grounds at stake extending far beyond either SV or Hollywood [1] - I don't really think boiling it down to 2 contenders is terribly important: It passes, and we lose. Or we'll end up having to fight an even tougher battle.
"This bill cannot be fixed; it must be killed." - The EFF On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Hans Aberg <haber...@telia.com> wrote: > Actually, it is a battle between the Hollywood and Silicon Valley industries. > > Hans > [1] It will cause substantial damage to large number of existing jobs in plenty of places as a result of massive amounts of litigation, it will stunt investment in anything which could potentially suffer from such litigation, it sets horrific precedents, goes beyond just 'piracy' with the Monster case as John pointed out, and could result in possible follow up laws in similar countries. -- Regards, Austin _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
