On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Gregory Collins <g...@gregorycollins.net> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Michael Snoyman <mich...@snoyman.com> > wrote: >> >> We can still have a conduit-based version of WAI and Warp, even if an >> underlying package uses enumerator. The enumerator usage from >> asn1-data doesn't leak into WAI or Warp at all[1]. We could ask >> Vincent to consider moving over to attoparsec-conduit instead, but I >> don't think there's any strong need for this. > > > Speaking of the migration issue; it should be possible to have an enumerator > <-> conduit wrapper library to help people continue to use their > enumerator-based code for awhile (and vice-versa).
I think it's easier said than done. Some conversions should be straight-forward: turning a Source into an Enumerator, for example. But others won't be possible without dirty hacks (e.g., Enumerator to Source will likely require forking a thread and using Chan), while others may be completely impossible (Enumeratee to Conduit). I agree such a package is a good idea, and I'd be happy to help anyone who wants to step up to the plate on it, but I'm not very hopeful that it will be incredibly useful. Michael _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
