Glad to hear that. I will checkout the trunk and try. On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Andres Löh <andres.l...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi. > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic > <ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 3 February 2012 17:29, Magicloud Magiclouds >> <magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Thank you. The document does say it more clearly than me. >>> But still, currently, ghc only gives me one option: cannot be built. >>> How about giving me another one: throw away the version information of >>> D when building A. So when A uses types in D with B and C, it might >>> work. Just the risk is on me now. >>> It is not perfect, but would work sometimes.... >> >> But not always. We'd then have other errors: "why isn't this build working?" >> >> Types can be re-exported, class instances are implicitly imported/exported, >> etc. > > It's a valid complaint, and there's ongoing work to fix some of these > issues. In the meantime, the development version of cabal-install, in > particular the new modular solver, can deal with a few situations that > can't be resolved by older cabal-install versions. I can't promise it > will help here. But I'm still interested in feedback. > > Cheers, > Andres
-- 竹密岂妨流水过 山高哪阻野云飞 And for G+, please use magiclouds#gmail.com. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe