Michael Snoyman <mich...@snoyman.com> wrote: > In this particular case, it will work due to the implementation of > snk. In general, however, you're correct: you should not use the same > sink twice. > > I haven't thought about it much yet, but my initial recommendation > would be to create a new Conduit using SequencedSink, which takes the > three lines and then switches over to a passthrough conduit. The > result looks like this: > > [...]
Thanks a lot. This conduit world is really new to me and feels a bit more complicated than enumerators, but at least I seem to be getting the right intuition. Greets, Ertugrul -- Key-ID: E5DD8D11 "Ertugrul Soeylemez <e...@ertes.de>" FPrint: BD28 3E3F BE63 BADD 4157 9134 D56A 37FA E5DD 8D11 Keysrv: hkp://subkeys.pgp.net/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
