On 8/02/2012, at 14:16, Steve Horne <sh006d3...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

> 
> I haven't given a lot of thought to updates. 
> 

I very much fail to see the point of replacing prefix function application with 
postfix dots, merely for field selection.  There are already some imperfect, 
but adequate, solutions to the problem of global uniqueness of field names.  
But you now have mentioned what is really bothering me about this discussion: 
record updates are simply the most painful and least beautiful part of the 
Haskell syntax.  Their verbosity is astonishing compared to the careful 
tenseness of every other language construct.  If we could spend some effort on 
designing a decent notation for field updates, I think it would be altogether 
more likely to garner support than fiddling with dots.

Regards,
    Malcolm

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to