On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Alp Mestanogullari <alpmes...@gmail.com>wrote:
> That's exactly what I would have needed, several times in the past 2 > years. I've been wondering about a good way to abstract this to have a > library where you'd just plug your "business logic" and thus not have to > care anymore about the implementation details, once and for all. > It's hard to know which abstraction might be sufficiently magical to allow you to skip caring about the implementation details; personally I think stm is pretty magical already :) G -- Gregory Collins <g...@gregorycollins.net>
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
