Ben Lippmeier <b...@ouroborus.net> wrote: > I pushed Repa 3.1 to Hackage on the weekend. It has a *much* cleaner API. I > can't recommend continuing to use Repa 2. You will just run into all the > problems that are now fixed in Repa 3. >
I was going to ask about the wiki page, and saw that you've posted a note there. Nice! Now only if someone would update it... :) http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Numeric_Haskell:_A_Repa_Tutorial Is the differences between Repa 2 and Repa 3 documented somewhere? I'm having trouble with running examples from the Repa paper... Thanks, Sajith. -- "the lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne." -- Chaucer. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
