> In standard ML you can start doing effect-based things inside a function > without having to alter its type and they type of everything that uses it, > and so on. This in turn causes a break-down in the type-system where weak type variables are introduced. We can see the pathological case for that here: http://www.cs.washington.edu/education/courses/cse505/00au/lectures/13-refs.txt
This makes regular things like curried function compositions unusable, because their polymorphicness goes away! Such is the result of not encapsulating side-effects. —Arlen _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
