HI Taylor. A few thoughts. First, even with joint sponsorship, I don't think saying "Official" in the name of the survey is a good idea. Everything is "official" from whatever group supports it, but that seems besides the point. I think that the intended meaning here is a bit slippery since it can be interpreted as "approved by some body" but is often used to mean "authoritative" and as we've discussed, you can't really be authoritative with things like this, just "better". Ok, that said, on to some other points:
"Are you interested in a new version of the Haskell standard?" Interested is a very vague thing to ask. I'd want something more specific like "how important do you feel it would be to have a new version..." On "Where do you interact with the Haskell community?" I think that we should distinguish between "conferences (academic)" and "conferences (commercial)" because ICFP and HaskellX, for example, are very different sorts of things. I'd also like a question, as I mentioned earlier, like "What sort of Haskell software is developed at your company" with options for "in-house" "binaries deployed to customers" and "webapps used by customers" among maybe other options. Also perhaps "is the software you work on A) bound by memory B) bound by processor utilization C) bound by wire/disk speed D) bound by serialization E) not running against any performance limits at this time" and additionally is the software intended A) for continuous (server) operation or B) batched operation or C) interactive user-driven operation. Cheers, Gershom On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 4:06 PM Francesco Ariis <fa...@ariis.it> wrote: > > Hello Taylor, > > On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 02:42:16PM -0400, Taylor Fausak wrote: > > Please > take a look at the survey to make sure that you're happy > > with it! Let me know if there are any questions that you would like > > to be added, removed, or changed. You can view the survey here: > > https://airtable.com/shr8G4RBPD9T6tnDf > > You can deliver feedback to me either in this thread or on GitHub: > > https://github.com/haskellweekly/haskellweekly.github.io/issues/206 > > Suggestions: > - state under which specific one of the "permissive license"s the > results will be available; > - if it not mission critical, axe the last question. > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-community mailing list > Haskell-community@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-community _______________________________________________ Haskell-community mailing list Haskell-community@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-community
