My bad - I misunderstood - I somehow thought that the problems that Simon was experiencing were somehow gated on Abbot.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Gershom B <[email protected]> wrote: > Can you elaborate on "getting abbot unstuck"? Our current logjam, which > I'm going to try to work on (and Ganesh will indeed chip in soon to solve > the two immediate outstanding requests) appears to be on community and > lambda. Given that abbot is still at galois, my impression is that it is > the "least" stuck of the servers? > > I could be quite wrong on all this -- so clarification would be very > useful. > > --Gershom > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Mark Lentczner <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> Uhm - I'd suggest that we get out of the logjam first: Just move abbot to >> a new machine at Hetzner. In the future we can decide to VM'up all our >> servers and run them on one physical.... but let's not make getting abbot >> unstuck predicated on all that work. >> >> _ Mark >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Gershom B <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> To make sure I'm understanding everything explicitly, when we say >>> "consolidate" everything, that means concretely the following? >>> >>> We currently have services running on abbot, lambda, and community. >>> Community is already a vm on lambda, I think? Abbot lives at galois. Lambda >>> lives on a Hetzner box (that .org funds pay for? other funds?) >>> >>> Now the proposal is to get a better Hetzner box that .org funds pay for, >>> on which will live three vms -- lambda, abbot and community. >>> >>> Is this correct? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Gershom >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Jason Dagit <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Ian, >>>> >>>> I think the next step is for me to ask the SPI treasurer how setup the >>>> subscription using the haskell.org account. I'll fire off an email now >>>> to get the process started. >>>> >>>> Thanks for working on this! >>>> >>>> Jason >>>> >>>> On Jun 12, 2013, at 8:56 AM, Ian Lynagh <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> > >>>> > Hi all, >>>> > >>>> > Now that Debian 7.0 has been released, I don't think there is anything >>>> > holding back our hardware/OS upgrade plans. The consensus from the >>>> last >>>> > discussion, as I understand it, is to consolidate everything onto (VMs >>>> > on) a Hetzner EX 4S >>>> > http://www.hetzner.de/en/hosting/produkte_rootserver/ex4s >>>> > >>>> > In total we'd want (with prices in EUR, including VAT @ 19%): >>>> > >>>> > Setup cost Monthly cost >>>> > >>>> > EX 4S 59.00 59.00 >>>> > IPv4 /29 0.00 8.00 >>>> > 500GB backup 9.90 9.90 >>>> > >>>> > Total: 68.90 76.90 >>>> > >>>> > Does that match everyone else's understanding? If so, committee, >>>> what's >>>> > the next step? >>>> > >>>> > Also, MSRC have kindly offered to let me spend some time on the >>>> initial >>>> > setup, so please let me know if you'd like to take us up on that. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Thanks >>>> > Ian >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > haskell-infrastructure mailing list >>>> > [email protected] >>>> > http://community.galois.com/mailman/listinfo/haskell-infrastructure >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> haskell-infrastructure mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://community.galois.com/mailman/listinfo/haskell-infrastructure >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> haskell-infrastructure mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://community.galois.com/mailman/listinfo/haskell-infrastructure >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ haskell-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] http://community.galois.com/mailman/listinfo/haskell-infrastructure
