On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Dan Burton <[email protected]> wrote:
> It seems that you are treating Producers like you would treat a handle. And > indeed, with "resumable", you can upgrade any Producer to a handle-like > Producer that retains its position across pipelines. Yes! The Handle analogy is exactly the description I was looking for. > But the whole advantage of the Pipes/Conduits/Iteratee abstraction over > handles is that the composition operators abstract away this "position" > stuff. As far as I can tell, idiomatic Pipes code typically only uses a > producer in exactly one pipeline. Right -- this is my feeling as well. I *can* write code using Producers like Handles -- but is it wrong to? It sure doesn't make me feel warm and fuzzy inside. - jeremy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haskell Pipes" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
