Renzo Carbonara <[email protected]> writes: > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Gabriel Gonzalez <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> So I would still be keeping the lenses and isomorphisms, but also >> adding unidirectional non-lens equivalents to give beginners an >> easier toe-hold. What do you all think? > > I think it might be even more confusing to increase the library in > size with new functions named similarly to the ones already present, > it might not be obvious “which of the two alternatives is the right > one”.
I agree, it would be better to present a single uniform API, instead of a combination of two different APIs. - ocharles -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haskell Pipes" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
