No, you would have to provide three separate functions in `pipes-group`
for the `FreeT` equivalents. However, I'm going to suggest in my
following response a compromise solution where we duplicate only the
`FreeT` lenses.
On 02/12/2014 08:24 PM, Pierre R wrote:
Ok, I think I found an approach that will satisfy everybody. This
solution only requires providing three utility functions in
`pipes-parse`:
debugView
:: (Producer a m x -> Producer b m y)
-> (Producer a m x -> Producer b m y)
debugView = id
debugZoom
:: (StateT (Producer a m x) m r -> StateT (Producer b m y)
m r)
-> (StateT (Producer a m x) m r -> StateT (Producer b m y)
m r)
debugZoom = id
debugOver
:: ( (Producer a m w -> Producer b m x)
-> (Producer c m y -> Producer d m z) )
-> ( (Producer a m w -> Producer b m x)
-> (Producer c m y -> Producer d m z) )
debugOver = id
is `debugView` supposed to work with FreeT lenses such as `lines` ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Haskell Pipes" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haskell
Pipes" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
