Other little personal notes: 1. As Danny points out, I am not sure `pipes-handle` is the right name for this library. Why not `pipes-stream` with a `Reader` module (Consumer) and a `Writer` module (Producer)? 2. I have found the signature of the `read` function to be a bit confusing because `read` in a streaming context usually does not involve String (particularly outside of Haskell). 3. The library might suffer from a lack of pertinent examples. For instance I still find `yield (f a)` to be clearer than `W.map f` 4` . The "naked" sentence "However, @pipes@ does not officially support this idiom" is kind of confusing and not really helpful.
Cheers On Saturday, February 15, 2014 3:30:36 PM UTC+1, Pierre R wrote: > > > > On Saturday, February 15, 2014 6:33:25 AM UTC+1, Gabriel Gonzalez wrote: >> >> Yes, `repeatM` and `mapM_` will be added for consistency. >> >> > I am probably missing the whole point of it but why is it called > `repeatM` as it does not seem to repeat anything ? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haskell Pipes" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
