Pardon all this confusion, but doesn't the rewrite rule for `(>~ cat)`
"m >~ cat" forall m .
m >~ cat =
let go = do
x <- m
yield x
go
in go
reduce
execU m = (lift m >> await) >~ cat
to the original definition in terms of `forever`? Admittedly, it does have
the advantage of correctness over my attempts ...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haskell Pipes" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
