Here is a suggestion:
https://github.com/k0001/pipes-network/issues/20#issuecomment-37095131

It is not convincing. Whatever the trick we use, optional/default/named 
params in Haskell is not nice, so it seems.

I don't like the statu quo either (forcing every users from the API to 
provide the nbytes) but well no language is perfect.

If anyone has a better idea ...

Cheers,

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Haskell Pipes" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].

Reply via email to