Hi David, I made some progress http://sprunge.us/iPPE Defining `splitOn` in terms of `breakOn` is pretty simple. Ideally one would like to use `T.splitOn`, since it is so fast and would speed up operations when we are taking in large text chunks; that would be a totally different structure.
The two formulations of `breakOn` follow your method and just pass along what could be an initial segment of a match: the first just keeps the last bit that is one Char shorter than the needle (irrespective of content); the other inspects this chunk. The second is nicer but I was worried the apparatus of inspection was going to slow things more than it was worth. It doesn't seem worse from some initial tests. Do they seem wrong, or clunky? Michael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haskell Pipes" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to haskell-pipes+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to haskell-pipes@googlegroups.com.
