Does a series of yields still exploit the benefits of decoupling? (e.g., independently able to stop the stream) - E
On Sunday, February 26, 2017 at 3:50:40 PM UTC-5, Gabriel Gonzalez wrote: > > B might sometimes be faster than A because `(~>)` is easier to optimize > than `(>->)` > > On Feb 26, 2017, at 12:24 PM, Edmund Cape <edmun...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > > If presented with the following design choices: > > A. getRecords h >-> parsePipe >-> P.print > > ...where the getRecords both awaits and yields > > > > B. ( (a -> m b) ~> (b -> m c) ) h >-> P.print > > ... where each of the kleisli arrows yields > > > Does A have 2 decoupled points > > #1. between getRecords h >-> and parsePipe > #2. between parsePipe and P.print's > > Versus B only one between the final yield from the second k :: (b -> m c) > and the await from P.print? > > If so, is there a performance consideration? > > Thanks in advance for letting me know. > > - E > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Haskell Pipes" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to haskell-pipe...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > To post to this group, send email to haskel...@googlegroups.com > <javascript:>. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haskell Pipes" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to haskell-pipes+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to haskell-pipes@googlegroups.com.
