Duncan Coutts wrote: > On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 10:38 -0400, Isaac Dupree wrote: >> Duncan Coutts wrote: >>> Maintainers propose their own packages, providing their own assessment >>> against a set of criteria. >> so if you're a random user/contributor then you have to ask your >> favorite package's maintainer to propose their own package. > > That's my opinion, yes. If you think even that needs discussing then we > can mention that when we propose it on the libs list.
well if I was a maintainer, I might be afflicted by a sort of modesty, and I think a couple other Haskell people can feel that too when their users are saying "we like this". Of course it's good to make sure that we(haskell-platform people) have maintainer's active consent, by requiring them to "propose" it. I wonder if I can come up with a wording that makes me happy (since I think we agree on the actual *procedure* we should have) -- probably not really important -Isaac _______________________________________________ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform