On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Simon Marlow<marlo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > We should consider these 3 packages as candidates for inclusion in the > platform, and deal with them as we would other candidates; i.e. subject > them to the proposal/review process (which I know is in the process of > being specified). > > In this case, we are in the slightly unfortunate position that if the > packages are not accepted for inclusion, and even in the absence of any > decision at all, the platform will be unable to ship the latest version > of OpenGL.
I would expect this to become a common occurrence as the platform grows, unless a suitable policy is devised. I think Ganesh's suggestion of making this an explicit requirement of maintainers is a very good idea, and codifying exactly what changes are acceptable for the platform may also be helpful. Cheers, John Lato _______________________________________________ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform
