I think we are stuck with the current behaviour (which I find entirely natural). If we can anticipate infinite lists then can we not solve HP<http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/turing-machine/#5.2> ?
Chris On 12 July 2011 22:30, haskell-platform < haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org> wrote: > #180: GHCi tries to print infinite list (like [1..]) > > ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- > Reporter: nsinreal | Owner: dons > Type: defect | Status: new > Priority: trivial | Milestone: > Component: GHC | Keywords: > > ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- > GHCi mustn't try to print infinite lists. Maybe GHCi must print some > warning for user > > -- > Ticket URL: <http://trac.haskell.org/haskell-platform/ticket/180> > haskell-platform <http://trac.haskell.org/haskell-platform> > The Haskell Platform: a comprehensive and robust collection of Haskell > libraries > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-platform mailing list > Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org > http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform
