On 22 March 2012 08:46, Johan Tibell <johan.tib...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi David, > > I don't think it'll be a problem in practice. However, I'm a bit > worried that GHC's own dependencies "leak." like this (which was > already the case before this proposed change.) Perhaps GHC should have > it's own private package database where it register dependencies > needed by the ghc and ghci packages?
Yes I completely agree. This is my first time getting involved in the haskell package game but it immediately struck me as a problem we shouldn't be having. I don't think I understand the situation well enough at this time to suggest a solution and I also don't really have much motivation to hack on a solution. But someone should :) Cheers, David > > Cheers, > Johan _______________________________________________ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform
