On Mar 23, 2012 7:25 AM, "David Terei" <davidte...@gmail.com> wrote: > > So do we have any proposal for a way forward here? seems the options now are: > > 1) Include mtl, haskeline, terminfo, utf8-string. Mark as hidden all except mtl. > > 2) As above but rename all except mtl to be ghc-* > > 3) Discuss including packages that provide functionality equivalent to > above packages in haskell platform, rework ghc code to depend on those > instead, include all packages and expose them. > > 4) Fix cabal / ghc to allow ghc to depend on packages and have them > remain truly internal > > I'd be happy with any of the first 3 and particularly the first 2 as > it minimizes the work i need to do. Long term 4 seems to be the right > approach.
Just to make sure it's explicit. Does this mean that breaking out GHCi to a seperate package isn't an option? If so, would it be possible to hear why? /M
_______________________________________________ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform
