On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Roman Leshchinskiy <r...@cse.unsw.edu.au> wrote: > [...] It still uses > "unsafe" to distinguish between functions that do bounds checking and > those that don't. What would be the benefit of moving functions like > unsafeIndex into a separate module (and would it be called > Unsafe.unsafeIndex then? or would it be Unsafe.index?)? [...]
Just to pick out this small tidbit, FWIW the Vector.index and Vector.Unsafe.index scheme has the advantage that you could simply swap out a module import to switch between bounds-checked and unchecked implementations. I agree with vector going into the platform, but have no opinion on whether the Safe Haskell issues need to be resolved first. -- Your ship was caught in a monadic eruption. _______________________________________________ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform
